AI’s Promise in Weather Forecasting: A Case Study
Matthew Kearney
Professor John Horgan
Seminar in Science Writing: HST 401
September 7, 2024
AI’s Promise in Weather Forecasting: A Case Study
Machine Learning Weather Prediction (MLWP) may soon bring significant developments to current meteorology. Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) has been our historical weather forecasting agent. Many recent research breakthroughs show great applications for MLWP, with similar or higher accuracy levels in a percentage of the time compared to modern systems. As for any technology, we should consider whether we need it in the first place. Is MLWP a rabbit hole of more convoluted, detail-filling science, or is it revolutionary? What can we take from it?
Stephen Hawking gave a solid framework for modeling reality in his 1980 inaugural lecture at the University of Cambridge, arguing that scientific progress may soon disclose a unified theory that would “describe all possible interactions.”. He addresses two requirements for modeling: (1) local laws ‘obeyed’ on a structural hierarchy by various physical quantities and (2) boundary conditions that inform the state of some regions through time, propagating reality (Hawking 1). This can be understood as the ‘laws’ – the forces and interaction of nature (usually expressed in differential equations), and the state – the matter and particles we see. Could MLWP systems learn and improve our theoretical knowledge of physics and bridge the gap toward a unified theory of theoretical physics? Are there ‘laws’ of nature, or are laws convenient?
Machine learning methods have become increasingly integral to our current weather forecasting. Downscaling supports finer-resolution predictions from global weather models for regional weather forecasting. Bias correction improves model performance using a dynamic weighting system to compare the quality of predictions, ultimately giving better predictors more power in the model. But this seems to be just the beginning of a fruitful relationship.
Researchers behind the November 2023 Google DeepMind study Learning skillful medium-range global weather forecasting developed a real-time global weather forecasting model using a graph neural network called GraphCast, trained on almost 40 years of historical global climate data, that proves overall more accurate and efficient than modern meteorological products in NWP. The study also concludes that further MLWP should be researched for specified tasks including but not limited to extreme temperature, atmospheric rivers, and tropical cyclone tracks. ECMWF has the experiential operational model available now!
GraphCast makes record advancements in the current state of weather prediction, generating global forecasting in less than one minute, compared to a scale of hours in modern forecast systems. Instead of relying on solving numerical methods with high-performance computers, GraphCast learns from weather data, capturing crucial information about nonlinear structures in the weather patterns, to generalize accurate forecasts in real time.
GraphCast also performs research on ‘recency’, appending subsequent years of climate data to train multiple models. This approach helps the model generalize to new, unseen data, such as that of our evolving industrialized climate. The researchers fairly “speculate the recency effect allows recent weather trends to be captured to improve accuracy,” (DeepMind), which certainly motivates the further study and danger of climate change. However, the study may have overlooked integral issues of confirmation and sampling bias.
The researchers quickly assume all improvement comes from the model capturing more recent weather trends, however do not properly consider the possibility of any improvement stemming from the increased volumes of training data in subsequent models which would certainly improve model accuracy as well. More rigorous bias mitigation knowledge should be pursued that would eliminate the introduction of bias to properly attribute climate change.
This study could make the training data for subsequent recency-updated GraphCast of the same data/time size instead, across the same time range to more accurately attribute improvements in performance to 1) just having more data or 2) it truthfully being the effect of capturing climate change in the model.
More research is necessary to validate the capacity of MWLP further for its deep insight into our natural world, and as with any other technology, be evaluated consistently as to how and where it serves humankind. The new computational paradigm of AI has arrived at the front door of scientific and human pursuit and is hitting the ground running. An essential question before us considers our boundaries with this advancement.
Automation and unemployment, social engineering, and capital-driven authoritarianism may be considered (by some) as increasing extremities on the dangers stemming from artificial intelligence, but are more actualized and one-in-the-same as every day passes. What ideals are we moving towards?
Our communities must be able to identify signs of discordance with humankind and envision more creative forms of scientific production. There is a growing tide of positive directions that our world is moving toward, and we must invite the same social discourse to critique how innovation and our world should be.
Works Cited
Lam, R., Sanchez-Gonzalez, A., Willson, M., Wirnsberger, P., Fortunato, M., Alet, F., Ravuri, S., Ewalds, T., Eaton-Rosen, Z., Hu, W., Merose, A., Hoyer, S., Holland, G., Vinyals, O., Stott, J., Pritzel, A., Mohamed, S., & Battaglia, P. (2023). GraphCast: Learning skillful medium-range global weather forecasting. American Association for the Advancement of Science. science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adi2336. 382(1), 6677
Horgan, J. (2024). Huge study confirms science ending! (Sort of). John Horgan (The Science Writer). johnhorgan.org/cross-check/yrb9e7uefpeqrlkiasoc6octxtnm5g.
Hawking, S. W. (1981). Is the End in Sight for Theoretical Physics?. Physics Bulletin, 32(1), 15
Comments
Post a Comment