Unlocking the Vault

Unlocking the Vault

Stacy Shang

A pattern of forgetfulness crept into my daily existence, intricately linked to my experiences of trauma. This isn't merely about misplacing keys or forgetting what I ate yesterday; it's a profound alteration in how my mind processes and recalls memories. Trauma has reshaped my mind, leaving vast patches of obscurity where clarity once resided. I've found that moments of intense stress and emotional duress have had a significant impediment on my memory retention, leading to a phenomenon where much of the trauma seems to be locked away, inaccessible through normal recollection efforts. This personal observation has propelled me to explore deeper into the realms of psychological and neurobiological research to answer a pressing question: How do traumatic experiences influence memory formation and recall, and what are the underlying neurobiological processes that contribute to these changes? This essay seeks to unravel the complex interactions between trauma and memory, and try to better understand this topic.

Trauma, a term derived from the Greek word for "wound," is used in modern psychology to describe the complex response to any distressing or life-altering event that overwhelms an individual’s ability to cope, often resulting in long-lasting psychological effects. It can manifest itself from various sources, ranging from physical threats to emotional abuse, and its impact can deeply alter an individual's emotional and psychological state. Trauma can also vary greatly in intensity and effect from person to person, though the American Psychological Association defines trauma as “an emotional response to a terrible event like an accident, crime, or natural disaster.” However, this definition has evolved to include responses to chronic stressors, such as ongoing emotional abuse, neglect, or community violence. It can lead to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a condition where the person continues to suffer from severe stress symptoms long after the traumatic event has ended. The human aspect of trauma is particularly important when discussing this topic, as it is a deeply personal experience that affects individuals in a profound and complex manner. This combination is also what makes trauma particularly challenging to treat and understand. For many, like in my own experience, trauma leads to significant memory disruptions, where memories become fragmented and disjointed, similar to a jigsaw puzzle with missing pieces. This disruption can significantly impact daily functioning, affecting everything from basic tasks to complex interpersonal interactions.

Researchers have varying theories about how trauma impacts people, discussing the psychological, physical, and spiritual effects that occur following these events. A pioneering researcher in trauma, Bessel van der Kolk, emphasized in his seminal piece, "The Body Keeps the Score," that trauma results in a fundamental reorganization of the way mind and brain manage perceptions. He describes it as a "body keeps the score" phenomenon, where the effects of trauma are not just psychological but are deeply embedded within the physical body. He specifically discusses how trauma can affect the brain’s limbic system, altering emotion regulation and memory processing. This disruption can lead to difficulties in forming new memories and retrieving existing ones. Pete Walker offers another valuable perspective in understanding trauma, particularly focusing on Complex PTSD, which often results from prolonged exposure to traumatic circumstances, especially in childhood. Walker discusses how ongoing neglect and emotional abuse can leave indelible marks on the psyche, manifesting as chronic emotional pain and vulnerability. He humanizes the impact of trauma, discussing its role in shaping an individual's identity and perception of the world, often leading to a lifelong struggle with trust, self-worth, and interpersonal relationships. To further understand the implications of trauma and memory, it’s also important to discuss memory formation and view the scientific and biological explanations for memory impairment.

Memory formation is a fundamental aspect of human cognition, enabling individuals to retain and utilize past experiences to navigate the present and future. It can be classified into different types based on duration and awareness. Short-term memory, also known as working memory, involves the temporary storage of information for immediate tasks and lasts from a few seconds to a few minutes, whereas long-term memory involves the consolidation of information over longer periods, making it more stable and durable (Camina). This consolidation process is where the brain converts transient daily experiences into fixed, accessible memories through complex biochemical and neurological processes. There are also distinctions based on the content and consciousness of memories, as explicit or declarative memories include facts and events that an individual can consciously recall, such as names, dates, or personal experiences. Implicit or procedural memories involve skills and tasks that can be performed without conscious thought, such as riding a bicycle or playing an instrument. The process of memory consolidation is particularly susceptible to the effects of stress hormones like cortisol, which is often elevated during and after traumatic events. Research shows that while moderate levels of cortisol can enhance the formation of memories, excessive levels can impair the consolidation process, leading to fragmented or blocked memories (Jiang). This neurochemical impact is a crucial factor in how traumatic memories are formed and later recalled—or not recalled, as may often be the case. Additionally, the hippocampus is a critical region in the brain for learning and memory, and is particularly vulnerable to stress. Prolonged exposure to stress can lead to hippocampal atrophy, which studies have shown in individuals with severe stress and PTSD (Kim). This degradation can severely impact the ability to form new memories and recall existing ones, leading to significant gaps in a person's autobiographical history.

From a scientific perspective, the mechanisms behind memory encoding involve changes at the synaptic level. In their research, Bisaz, Reto et al. delve into the neurobiological bases of how memories are formed and consolidated at the synaptic level, emphasizing the pivotal role of neurotransmitters like glutamate in facilitating long-term potentiation (LTP). LTP represents the strengthening of synaptic connections between neurons, a crucial mechanism underpinning learning and memory. However, their findings also illustrate how traumatic experiences can disrupt these normal synaptic processes. The excessive release of neurotransmitters during a traumatic event can induce an overload of calcium in neurons, which may cause cellular damage and impede the memory formation process. This disruption affects not only the storage of traumatic memories but also the ability to form new, non-traumatic memories. Such neurochemical and synaptic alterations due to trauma do not just impact memory encoding and storage but also have broader implications for cognitive functions, affecting individuals' daily lives and long-term mental health. This can allow us to understand potential therapeutic strategies that can address the neurobiological effects of trauma. 

Viewing the relationship between trauma and memory from a nuanced perspective can allow us to understand its complexity and psychopathologies. It’s undeniable to acknowledge van der Kolk’s work and how his contributions have brought the discussion of PTSD to mainstream media. However, van der Kolk's approach has not been without criticism. Critics, including those highlighted in Danielle Carr's analysis, have pointed out the potential oversimplifications within van der Kolk's theories. Carr's critique centers on the contention that while van der Kolk's focus on the physical manifestation of trauma was revolutionary, it may not adequately account for the nuanced interplay between biology, psychology, and the social environment. Some argue that his biological emphasis might underemphasize the significant roles that psychological and social factors play in trauma recovery. Additionally, certain claims made by van der Kolk, particularly regarding the efficacy of some therapeutic methods, lack rigorous scientific validation. Critics have expressed concerns that comparing PTSD and other trauma responses to physical brain injuries might be misleading, as these comparisons often lack sufficient empirical support. 

These criticisms open a broader discussion about the need for an integrated approach in understanding and treating trauma. Van der Kolk’s work underscores the necessity of embracing a multifaceted perspective that encompasses both the physiological impacts highlighted by his research and the psychological insights offered by others in the field. For instance, Pete Walker's exploration of emotional neglect and complex PTSD introduces psychological dimensions that interact significantly with van der Kolk’s physiological findings. Walker identifies specific trauma responses and emotional flashbacks that contribute to the complex symptomatology of PTSD, which are not solely rooted in physical changes but also in the psychological aftermath of trauma. This intersection of theories suggests that a holistic treatment approach, addressing both the somatic and emotional aspects of trauma, is essential for effective therapy. Integrating neurobiological insights from researchers like Bisaz, Reto et al. with psychological theories provides a more comprehensive understanding of how traumatic memories are formed, stored, and can be therapeutically accessed. Such integration highlights the importance of developing treatments that are not only informed by neurobiological changes but also consider the psychological and emotional needs of trauma survivors.

Through viewing these pieces together, it’s clear that an integrated approach is crucial for advancing treatment and understanding. The discourse often risks trivializing the profound psychological impacts of trauma with its overemphasis in contemporary dialogue. To maintain its clinical relevance and avoid diluting information, it is important to balance acknowledging the severe effects of trauma without overgeneralizing. Moving forward requires a holistic approach that marries the neurobiological mechanisms outlined by researchers like Bisaz, Reto et al. with the psychological insights from clinicians like van der Kolk and Walker. Additionally, refining dominant theories such as van der Kolk's is vital, emphasizing a nuanced understanding that incorporates both psychological and social dimensions to develop more effective therapeutic interventions for those grappling with traumatic memories. This concerted effort will not only aid in treatment but also ensure a more empathetic and informed discourse in the field.

Works Cited

Bisaz, Reto et al. “The neurobiological bases of memory formation: from physiological 

conditions to psychopathology.” Psychopathology vol. 47,6 (2014): 347-56. 

doi:10.1159/000363702

Camina, Eduardo, and Francisco Güell. “The Neuroanatomical, Neurophysiological and 

Psychological Basis of Memory: Current Models and Their Origins.” Frontiers in 

pharmacology vol. 8 438. 30 Jun. 2017, doi:10.3389/fphar.2017.00438

Carr, Danielle. “How Trauma Became America’s Favorite Diagnosis.” Intelligencer, Intelligencer, 

31 July 2023, 

nymag.com/intelligencer/article/trauma-bessel-van-der-kolk-the-body-keeps-the-score-pr

ofile.html. 

Jiang, Alice et al. “Acute stress-induced cortisol elevation during memory consolidation 

enhances pattern separation.” Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) vol. 26,4 

121-127. 21 Mar. 2019, doi:10.1101/lm.048546.118

Kim, Eun Joo et al. “Stress effects on the hippocampus: a critical review.” Learning & memory 

(Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) vol. 22,9 411-6. 18 Aug. 2015, doi:10.1101/lm.037291.114

Strange, Deryn, and Melanie K T Takarangi. “Memory distortion for traumatic events: the role of 

mental imagery.” Frontiers in psychiatry vol. 6 27. 23 Feb. 2015, 

doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00027

“Trauma.” American Psychological Association, American Psychological Association, 

www.apa.org/topics/trauma. Accessed 4 May 2024. 

Van der Kolk, Bessel. The Body Keeps the Score. IDreamBooks Inc, 2015. 

Walker, Pete M.A. Complex PTSD: From Surviving to Thriving: A Guide and Map for Recovering 

from Childhood Trauma. Azure Coyote, 2013. 

Walker, Pete. “Emotional Neglect and Complex PTSD.” Pete Walker, 

pete-walker.com/pdf/emotionalNeglectComplexPTSD.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2024.